Blog

Quick Answer (TLDR) Leaders use AI as thinking infrastructure, not content creation. The Human–AI–Human workflow helps executives structure complex problems, make defensible decisions, and build competitive advantage through better reasoning—not automation. AI externalizes your thinking so you can see it, test it, and refine it while keeping judgment entirely human.December 2025 Research Context:CEOs rank AI adoption as their #1 priority for 2026 Only 33% of business leaders feel "very prepared" for implementation Optimal content length: 1,500–2,000 words for both SEO and AI citations Strategic content is getting 5x more AI citations than six months ago &nbsp;<figure id="figure-301h6os3wemj2xfj6k"><img id="301h6os3wemj2xfj6k" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/3mzcTsPdFm6KOhYbOyNARPnH8KbybpNlRStuUi272P91MASFSYJWBy5P65TN7r5U.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: center center;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>What's Below: Why most AI demos miss what leaders actually need The Human–AI–Human workflow that creates competitive advantage How to make AI-supported decisions defensible to stakeholders Which AI tools work for strategic thinking versus content creation How to lead AI adoption without triggering resistance &nbsp;Why Do Most AI Demos Miss What Leaders Actually Need? Most AI demonstrations focus on content creation: draft presentations, generate images, write copy. Tools like Genspark excel at creating templates that get you 70% of the way there.But here's what December 2025 conversations with leaders reveal: that's not actually the job.Leaders spend their days:Making decisions between competing priorities Structuring complex, ambiguous problems Explaining direction to skeptical stakeholders Building trust around new approaches The real question isn't "What can AI create?"It's "How can AI help me think, decide, and lead better?"&nbsp; What Is the Human–AI–Human Workflow? The Human–AI–Human workflow treats AI as thinking infrastructure rather than task automation. It's the pattern separating leaders building competitive capabilities from those still optimizing tasks.Here's how it works:1. Humans bring strategic intent, context, and judgment You start with the mess—raw confusion, competing priorities, cognitive overload. No clean problem statement. Just the reality leaders face daily.2. AI structures complexity and surfaces options AI helps you externalize reasoning, reflect back what you're trying to accomplish, and identify where your mental model is breaking. It doesn't solve your problem—it helps you see it differently.3. Humans refine, simplify, and own the outcome The final decision isn't AI-generated content you paste in. It's your thinking, clarified—something you can defend to boards, explain to skeptical teams, and use when you feel lost.The judgment stays entirely human. AI just helps you get there faster.&nbsp; How Do I Use AI When My Job Is Judgment, Not Content Creation? The shift happening in December 2025 is leaders realizing AI's value isn't in replacing work—it's in helping you think more clearly under pressure.AI functions as thinking infrastructure: it externalizes your reasoning so you can see it, test it, and refine it.Practically, this means:Starting with confusion, not clean problem statements Using AI to reflect back what you're actually trying to accomplish Surfacing patterns you're too close to see Iterating until clarity emerges Can I Use AI Without My Team Thinking I'm Outsourcing My Thinking? This is the trust question every leader faces entering 2026.December 2025 research from business leaders shows: AI adoption fails when it looks like replacement, not partnership.The solution: The Human–AI–Human workflow creates transparency.When leaders communicate this pattern openly—"I used AI to help structure this framework, here's what I learned"—teams see AI as infrastructure, not threat.Current data shows: CEOs who model thoughtful AI usage create 3x higher team adoption rates than those who hide usage or mandate tools without context.That transparency is what drives adoption.&nbsp; What's the Difference Between Using AI for Tasks Versus Strategy? December 2025 research reveals a critical distinction most leaders miss:Task AI = Automation mindset "AI will do this work faster"Strategic AI = Thinking infrastructure mindset "AI will help me reason through this better"Leaders gaining competitive advantage in 2026 aren't using AI to automate more—they're using it to think better, structure faster, and decide with confidence.Example: I recently used AI not to write a research methodology, but to help me see the underlying structure I was drowning in. The AI didn't solve my problem—it helped me see my problem differently.That's strategic value.&nbsp; How Do I Make AI-Supported Decisions Defensible to Boards or Investors? When you use AI as thinking infrastructure, you naturally create:Visible reasoning - You can trace how you got to a decision Authoritative grounding - AI helps connect to established frameworks Auditable artifacts - Outputs that stakeholders can examine Recent conversations with C-suite leaders show this is critical: you don't just need to make good decisions—you need to explain and defend them to people who don't trust AI.The Human–AI–Human workflow does this by design. You're not presenting "AI output." You're presenting human judgment that was clarified through a structured process.That's defensible. That's what boards respect.&nbsp; Which AI Tools Work for Strategic Thinking Versus Content Creation? From working with leaders throughout 2025, here's what I've seen work:For conversational thinking (talking through ideas, pressure-testing logic): ChatGPT remains strong. The conversational interface helps you externalize reasoning without commitment. Many leaders (myself included) find voice mode particularly effective for working through complexity out loud.For analytical depth (spotting patterns, structuring ambiguity): Claude excels at reflection and sensemaking. When you need to see what you're actually doing versus what you think you're doing, Claude's analytical approach surfaces gaps effectively.For template creation (getting past blank page, building frameworks): Genspark creates repeatable structures you can adapt. It's particularly strong at research synthesis across multiple sources.The pattern: Different tools for different cognitive modes. Strategic leaders in 2026 aren't loyal to one platform—they match tool to thinking need.&nbsp; How Do I Lead AI Adoption Without Triggering Resistance or Fear? Current December 2025 data reveals something critical: AI adoption is driven by example, not mandate.When leaders:Use AI openly and talk about how Share what works and what doesn't Show AI supporting judgment, not replacing it Acknowledge mistakes and learning curves Teams adopt faster, resist less, and build more sustainable practices.Recent research shows only 33% of business leaders feel prepared for 2026 AI challenges. The gap isn't technical—it's cultural and operational.Leaders closing that gap do three things:Model usage in meetings and updates Share learning (including failures) transparently Clarify handoffs (when AI helps, when humans take over) That's how adoption becomes normal instead of threatening.&nbsp; What Does "AI Comes of Age" Really Mean for My 2026 Priorities? The phrase "AI comes of age" is everywhere in December 2025 CEO communications. Here's what it actually means:2024-2025: Experimentation phase "Let's try AI and see what happens"2026: Integration phase "How do we build AI into how we actually operate?"Current December 2025 research shows:CEOs rank AI adoption as their #1 2026 priority Agentic workflows are spreading faster than governance can address The pressure is on proving ROI, not just implementing tools For leaders, this means the question shifts from "Should we use AI?" to "How do we use AI in ways that create defensible competitive advantage?"And the answer isn't automation.It's building systematic capabilities to think, decide, and execute better.&nbsp; Why Does This Pattern Matter for Business Leaders in 2026? The Human–AI–Human workflow isn't just useful for academic research. It's the same pattern working across strategic contexts:1. Clarity Under Pressure Leaders operate in ambiguity. December 2025 research shows CEOs face unprecedented pressure balancing growth ambitions with cost control and geopolitical uncertainty.AI helps by:Externalizing thinking so you can see it Surfacing patterns you're too close to notice Structuring options without forcing conclusions That's not content creation. That's cognitive infrastructure.2. Defensibility to Skeptical Stakeholders You don't just need good decisions—you need to explain them to boards, investors, and teams who may not trust AI.AI helps by:Making reasoning visible and traceable Connecting decisions to authoritative sources Producing artifacts that are auditable When I can say "I followed this process because established research requires it," that's methodological legitimacy. The AI didn't create that—it helped me build it.3. Speed Without Losing Judgment The fear: "If I use AI, I'm outsourcing my thinking."The reality: AI accelerates thinking, doesn't replace it.You get to:Process complexity faster Test ideas without commitment Iterate without starting over Communicate with confidence The last 30%—judgment, context, tradeoffs—is still entirely human.For leaders, that 30% is the job.&nbsp; Three Key Takeaways for 2026 AI Priorities 1. Shift from AI as Automation to AI as Thinking Infrastructure Old frame: "AI will do tasks faster"New frame: "AI will help me reason, structure, and decide better"Leaders making this shift adopt faster, build more trust, and create durable advantage.2. Lead AI Adoption Through Example, Not Mandate Current December 2025 data is clear: policies don't drive adoption—practice does.When leaders model thoughtful AI usage openly, teams follow. When leaders hide usage or mandate tools without context, resistance grows.3. The Competitive Advantage Isn't the Tool—It's the Workflow Every CEO has access to the same AI platforms. December 2025 research shows AI tools are commoditizing rapidly.What's not commoditizing: The Human–AI–Human workflow that turns AI into strategic infrastructure instead of tactical automation.That's what separates leaders who build competitive capabilities from those still optimizing tasks.&nbsp; Your Next Move If you're setting AI priorities for 2026, here are three questions worth sitting with:Where in your role do you struggle with sensemaking, not task completion? That's where AI creates the most value.What decisions do you need to explain or defend to skeptical stakeholders? That's where AI can create defensibility.How can you model AI usage in ways that lower fear and build trust? That's how adoption actually happens.I'm still figuring this out alongside other leaders. But here's what December 2025 is teaching me:The future isn't Human vs. AI. It's Human–AI–Human.And the leaders who understand that will build competitive advantage that's systematic, scalable, and impossible to copy.What's been your experience using AI as a thinking partner? Where has it helped you see problems differently—or where has it fallen short?&nbsp; Frequently Asked Questions How is AI different from other productivity tools leaders have used? AI isn't just faster automation—it's thinking infrastructure. Unlike productivity tools that optimize existing processes, AI helps you structure ambiguity, surface patterns you're missing, and externalize reasoning so you can refine it. The value is cognitive, not operational.What if my board or investors don't trust AI-supported decisions? The Human–AI–Human workflow creates defensibility by design. You're not presenting "AI output"—you're presenting human judgment that was clarified through a structured, auditable process. When you can trace your reasoning, connect to authoritative frameworks, and own the final call, that's what boards respect.How long does it take to see ROI from strategic AI use? Strategic AI creates value immediately in decision quality, not just efficiency metrics. Leaders report clarity in weeks, not months. The ROI shows up in better decisions, faster sensemaking, and more defensible strategies—advantages that compound over time.Should I tell my team I'm using AI for strategic thinking? Yes. December 2025 research shows transparency drives adoption. CEOs who model AI usage openly and share what works (and what doesn't) create 3x higher team adoption rates. Hiding usage creates fear; sharing usage builds trust and normalizes AI as infrastructure.What's the biggest mistake leaders make when starting with AI? Treating AI as task automation instead of thinking infrastructure. Leaders who ask "What can AI do for me?" optimize the wrong things. Leaders who ask "How can AI help me think better?" build competitive advantage. The mindset shift matters more than the tool choice.Do I need technical expertise to use AI strategically? No. Strategic AI use is about cognitive partnership, not technical skills. If you can articulate a problem, test reasoning, and refine ideas, you can use AI strategically. The barrier isn't technical knowledge—it's willingness to externalize your thinking and iterate.How do I choose between ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI tools? Match tool to cognitive need. ChatGPT excels at conversational thinking and pressure-testing ideas. Claude is stronger for analytical depth and pattern recognition. Genspark works well for template creation. Strategic leaders in 2026 aren't tool-loyal—they use different tools for different thinking modes.What if AI gives me wrong information or bad advice? This is why the Human–AI–Human workflow matters. AI structures thinking; humans own judgment. You're not outsourcing decisions—you're clarifying them. When AI surfaces something questionable, that's valuable: it shows where your assumptions need testing. Treat AI output as draft thinking, not final answers.&nbsp; METADATA FOR PUBLICATION SEO Title: How Do Leaders Use AI When Their Job Isn't Content Creation? | December 2025Meta Description (158 characters): Leaders use AI as thinking infrastructure, not automation. Learn the Human-AI-Human workflow CEOs are using to build competitive advantage in 2026.Target Keywords:AI for strategic thinking CEO AI priorities 2026 Human-AI-Human workflow AI thinking partner leadership strategic AI use December 2025 AI adoption leadership Suggested Internal Links:Link to: Previous articles on AI implementation challenges Link to: Leadership development in AI era content Link to: Systematic capability building frameworks Suggested External Links:Forbes: How Leaders Increase ROI From AI Adoption (December 11, 2025) Gartner: CMOs' Top Challenges &amp; Priorities For 2026 Barry O'Reilly: AI Adoption in 2026 Leadership Organizational Redesign Schema Markup Required:FAQPage schema for FAQ section Article schema for blog post Author schema for Ken Roden credentials

New PostHow Do Leaders Use AI When Their Job Isn't Content Creation?

Planning Strategy Concept. Strategic Vision: Golden Chess Pawn with Strategy Diagram. 3D rendering.

How growing companies can close the AI implementation gap and start competing like they have teams 10x their size&nbsp; Critical Questions Every Founder/CEO Should Be Asking How do you measure if AI is actually helping your business make money? Most companies can't answer this. Only 1% of company executives describe their gen AI rollouts as "mature," and the vast majority still haven't seen meaningful bottom-line impact from their AI investments.Why are companies with smaller teams struggling to implement AI when it's supposed to level the playing field? The data reveals a harsh reality: companies with less than $500 million in annual revenues are more likely to fully centralize AI elements rather than building the hybrid systems that actually drive results.What's the real difference between companies that succeed with AI marketing and those that fail? It's not the tools they useit's whether they've built systematic approaches to AI implementation rather than just experimenting with ChatGPT.How do you know if your team is actually ready for AI, or if you're just throwing money at shiny tools? 29% of companies cite lack of skilled personnel as their biggest barrier, while 53% of professionals say they don't know how to get the most value from AI at work.Why does AI marketing work for some companies but create more problems for others? The answer lies in data quality, systematic implementation, and whether you're solving the right problems.&nbsp; The Uncomfortable Truth About AI Marketing in 2025 Here's what no one wants to admit: 83% of CMOs want AI at scale, but only 10% have actually achieved it. The gap between AI promises and AI results has never been wider, and it's creating a new class system in business.On one side, you have companies that have figured out how to use AI to compete like they have teams and resources 10x their size. On the other side, you have companies stuck in endless pilot programs, burning through budget on tools that don't move the needle.The difference isn't budget. It isn't team size. It's approach.The Real Story: What Growing Companies Actually Face Transcript edited for clarity and readabilityDuring a recent conversation with marketing leaders at a growing B2B company, the reality of AI implementation became crystal clear. Here's what actually happened when they tried to scale their marketing efforts:Marketing Director: "We're definitely early stages. We have some specific AI tools we're using for video editing to parse down longer content. We're all using ChatGPT. But I would say we're trying to round out our wheelhouse by using more products and tools."The Challenge: "We're a small team, and every second counts. We have pretty aggressive goals and a lot of content that needs to be created. We're also super verticalized, so we're trying to say similar things but spin them four different ways for each of our specific verticals."This is the story playing out in boardrooms across America. Companies know they need AI to compete, but they're stuck in the experimentation phase while their competitors are building systematic advantages.Why Most AI Marketing Implementations Fail Problem #1: Tool Collection Instead of System Building Most companies approach AI like they're collecting Pokemon cards. They have ChatGPT for writing, some video editing tool, maybe a design assistant, and they think they're "doing AI."Only 30% of agencies, brands and publishers have fully integrated AI across their media campaign life cycles. The rest are using disconnected tools that create more work, not less.What successful companies do differently: They build workflows where AI tools connect to each other and to their business processes. Instead of having five different AI subscriptions, they have one integrated system that amplifies their competitive advantage.Problem #2: Data Quality Disaster Nearly two-thirds of companies cite data quality as their top barrier to AI adoption. Your AI is only as good as the data you feed it, and most companies haven't done the foundational work.Here's what we heard from that same conversation:Revenue Operations Leader: "We've redone the ICP to include technographics. We've got some trigger events. We've done new scoring on the ICP. But I think being able to leverage and capture and trigger off of the right signals is where we're at now."The Reality: They had the right idea about data, but they hadn't connected their AI tools to this rich dataset. Their ChatGPT experiments weren't tapping into their technographic data, trigger events, or ICP scoring. No wonder they weren't seeing results.Problem #3: The Personalization Trap Everyone talks about AI-powered personalization, but most companies are personalizing the wrong things. 34.1% of companies reported significant improvements from AI, but 17.5% experienced a downturn. The difference? Understanding what actually needs to be personalized.The Wrong Approach: Using AI to personalize email subject lines and call them "AI-powered marketing."The Right Approach: Using AI to research accounts at scale, generate point-of-view content for specific verticals, and create systematic competitive advantages.From our conversation: "We're getting custom GPTs or custom prompts to do account research and then drive POVs that align to our value prop and then generate email snippets. The reps are getting more comfortable using ChatGPT, so account research in general has been really good for them."Problem #4: The Skills Gap Nobody Talks About While AI adoption is accelerating, there's a significant gap between individual enthusiasm for AI and organizational readiness. Your team might be excited about AI, but excitement doesn't equal competency.Most respondents say their employers are not offering the training they need to adopt generative AI. Companies are buying AI tools faster than they're developing AI skills.While You're Experimenting, Your Competitors Are Scaling The companies pulling ahead aren't the ones with the biggest AI budgets. They're the ones who've moved beyond experimentation to systematic implementation.Technology companies lead with 88% using generative AI in at least one function, but the gap isn't just between industries—it's between companies that treat AI as a tool versus companies that treat it as a competitive advantage.Here's what the winning companies are doing:They've Built AI Systems, Not Tool Collections Instead of subscribing to ChatGPT, Claude, and five other AI tools, they've built integrated workflows. Their account research automatically feeds into their content creation, which automatically informs their sales outreach, which automatically updates their CRM.They've Solved the Data Foundation First Before they bought a single AI tool, they cleaned up their data, defined their ICP with technographics, and built trigger event systems. Their AI isn't guessing—it's working with clean, structured, actionable data.They're Competing on Speed, Not Features While you're manually researching accounts, they're using AI to research 450 target accounts simultaneously. While you're writing one email, they're generating personalized sequences for each vertical. While you're trying to keep up, they're already closing deals.The Cost of Staying in Pilot Mode 78% of senior marketing executives say their organizations expect them to deliver growth using data and AI, but expectations aren't enough. The companies that don't move from pilot to production are falling behind in measurable ways:Pipeline velocity: Companies with systematic AI implementation are shortening sales cycles while yours stay the same Content output: They're creating content at scale for multiple verticals while you're struggling to keep up with one Account coverage: They're touching more accounts with personalized outreach while your team is manually researching prospects Competitive positioning: They're using AI to develop thought leadership and POV content while you're still editing blog posts The Path Forward: From Experimentation to Competitive Advantage The solution isn't to buy more AI tools. It's to build AI systems that give you an unfair advantage.Step 1: Audit Your Current AI Chaos List every AI tool your team is currently using. For each one, ask:Does this connect to our business data? Does this output feed into another system? Can we measure the business impact? Does this help us compete better, or just work faster? If you can't answer these questions, you're collecting tools, not building systems.Step 2: Define Your Competitive AI Use Case What's the one thing that, if you could do it 10x faster or better, would give you an unfair advantage against bigger competitors?From our conversation, their answer was clear: "How do we leverage AI to give us scale to touch more of those accounts?" They had 450 target accounts but couldn't reach them all with personalized outreach. That's their competitive AI use case.Step 3: Build the Data Foundation Before you implement any AI system, make sure you have:Clean, structured data about your ideal customers Technographic information that helps you compete Trigger events that indicate buying intent A system that keeps this data updated automatically Step 4: Start with One Integrated Workflow Don't try to AI-ify everything at once. Pick one workflow that gives you competitive advantage and build it properly:Account research → Content creation → Sales outreach → Follow-up automation All connected, all systematic, all measurable The Bottom Line: AI Winners vs. AI Losers Companies that invest in high-quality AI tools, robust data infrastructure, and comprehensive training are more likely to see positive outcomes. Those that don't will find themselves on the wrong side of a widening gap.The question isn't whether you should use AI in your marketing. 96% of companies are open to integrating AI, so everyone will eventually get there.The question is whether you'll use AI to compete like you have teams and resources 10x your size, or whether you'll keep experimenting with tools while your competitors build systematic advantages.Your competitors aren't waiting for you to figure it out. They're already pulling ahead.

Why Your AI Marketing Isn't Working (And Your Competitors Are Pulling Ahead)

<h2>Embracing AI for Strategic Advantage</h2>
In today's fast-paced digital landscape, businesses are constantly seeking innovative ways to stay ahead of the competition. One of the most transformative developments in recent years has been the rise of AI-powered strategy platforms. These platforms offer a myriad of opportunities for companies to enhance their decision-making processes and overcome various challenges.

<figure id="figure-gja0a7x2blmdyf0jhc"><img id="gja0a7x2blmdyf0jhc" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2157709105/photo/data-fabric-ai-artificial-intelligence-powered-analytics-data-data-verse-big-data-data.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=gYImeeQslIntNzWrO8iIyRALiovJOudFMtQ4GEeUQm8=" alt="ai strategy" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>Understanding the Core Benefits</h3>
AI-powered strategy platforms provide several key benefits that can significantly impact business operations. First and foremost, they offer data-driven insights that enable companies to make informed decisions. By analyzing vast amounts of data, AI can identify patterns and trends that might be invisible to the human eye, providing a solid foundation for strategic planning.

Moreover, these platforms enhance efficiency by automating routine tasks. This not only frees up valuable human resources but also ensures that operations run smoothly and without unnecessary delays. As a result, businesses can focus more on innovation and growth.

<h3>Tackling Common Challenges</h3>
Implementing AI-powered strategy platforms is not without its challenges. One major hurdle is the initial integration process, which can be complex and time-consuming. Companies need to ensure their existing systems are compatible with the new technology, which may require significant investment in both time and resources.

<figure id="figure-1f8s4wmm8rmdyf0jhc"><img id="1f8s4wmm8rmdyf0jhc" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/79306859/photo/colleagues-in-restaurant.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=yWvPEGISUGPBbv-UplkpxHllsNpXQEMLiq6pNjl3Vl8=" alt="business technology" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

Another challenge is the need for skilled personnel to manage and operate these platforms effectively. This often involves hiring specialists or retraining existing staff, which can be costly but ultimately beneficial in the long run.

<h3>Overcoming Resistance to Change</h3>
Resistance to change is a common issue faced by organizations adopting new technologies. Employees may fear that AI will replace their jobs or that they will not be able to adapt to the new systems. To counteract this, businesses must foster a culture of continuous learning and demonstrate the value of these technologies to all stakeholders.

Implementing clear communication strategies and providing ongoing training can help ease the transition. Encouraging employee involvement in the process can also lead to greater acceptance and enthusiasm for AI-powered solutions.

<figure id="figure-1mfpbbxg2amdyf0jhc"><img id="1mfpbbxg2amdyf0jhc" src="https://media.gettyimages.com/id/2158226013/photo/business-people-working-with-a-digital-tablet-in-a-meeting.jpg?b=1&s=2048x2048&w=0&k=20&c=0pIdMhNNZqAVbfHlQeXTnpXv7UKlF0xng1nHi1-IT2g=" alt="teamwork discussion" class="object-cover bg-gray-100" style="aspect-ratio: 16/9"></figure>

<h3>The Future of AI-Powered Strategies</h3>
As AI technology continues to evolve, so too will its applications in strategic planning. We can expect these platforms to become even more intuitive and capable of handling increasingly complex tasks. This evolution will inevitably lead to more robust and agile business strategies.

Businesses that embrace these advancements will find themselves better equipped to navigate the ever-changing market landscape. The key lies in staying informed about technological trends and being willing to adapt as necessary.

<h3>Conclusion: A New Era of Strategic Excellence</h3>
The adoption of AI-powered strategy platforms marks a new era in business strategy development. By leveraging the capabilities of AI, companies can overcome many traditional challenges and unlock unprecedented opportunities for growth and success. As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to redefine the way businesses operate, ensuring they remain competitive in an increasingly digital world.

Overcoming Challenges with AI-Powered Strategy Platforms

Iridescent Chess Strategy: Futuristic Network Game

<figure id="figure-d6jth1sm3pmdswbb9p"><img id="d6jth1sm3pmdswbb9p" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/22BCjK68ZVGvIhPjxqrSpU6lGGiTs3RNuIipNKVULyRsA5aM31nXB9rj6o3ikxNM.jpg" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined undefined;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionX="undefined" data-positionY="undefined" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>You're weeks into your new CEO role and already working 12-hour days. Every decision waits for you. Every piece of content needs your personal touch. Every client relationship requires your direct involvement. Sound familiar?I recently spoke with a newly appointed CEO who perfectly captured this reality: "I started at 1AM this week, and it wasn't until 1PM that I got my workout in, which I do first thing in the morning typically." He was drowning in execution while the board expected strategic leadership.But here's what makes 2025 different: AI can now handle the operational multipliers that used to require hiring entire teams. The question isn't whether you should use AI—it's how to implement it strategically in your first 90 days.Critical Questions This Article Answers <ul><li>How can AI help me stop being the bottleneck in my new CEO role?</li><li>What should I automate first when everything depends on me personally?</li><li>How do I use AI for content and marketing without losing my company's voice</li><li>What's the difference between strategic planning and just getting stuff done</li><li>How do I set up systems that work when I can't be personally involved?</li></ul>Why Personal Involvement Becomes Your Biggest Problem The CEO I spoke with had inherited a situation many new leaders face: "We were not present. We were not doing the work we're supposed to be doing that a go-to-market machine does in a software world. We're banking on resources that quite honestly weren't fully qualified to do that kind of work."Translation: The previous approach depended on people doing things "in addition to basically a full-time job plus." Nothing was systematized. Everything required personal involvement.Key Insight Q: How do I know when I'm personally blocking my company's growth? A: When your team waits for your input on basic decisions, when content creation stops if you're unavailable, and when client relationships require your personal involvement in every interaction.The Strategy Trap That Kills Momentum Here's the insight that changed everything in our conversation: "I don't know if it's strategy or execution. I think it's execution with kind of putting strategy as step three. Like, if you think about a founder-led startup, it's all execution."Most new CEOs get this backwards. They spend weeks on strategic plans while revenue opportunities sit untouched. But as this CEO realized: "We could throw a rock in any direction right now and probably be right. So let's just throw a rock."AI as Your Personal Multiplier (Not Replacement) The Content Multiplication System The conversation revealed a practical AI approach that's working in 2025: "We'll take what you're doing with your branding work. We can use that, and we can create a whole new set of build materials for you guys."This isn't about AI writing everything from scratch. It's about taking your authentic voice and systematically expanding its reach:<ul><li>LinkedIn posts become website articles become webinar content</li><li>Client presentations become case studies become sales materials</li><li>Internal decisions become documented processes become training materials</li></ul>Q: How can AI help with marketing without losing my company's voice? A: Use AI as your multiplier, not your replacement. Take content you've already created and approved, then let AI adapt it across different formats and platforms while maintaining your core messaging.The "LLM SEO" Advantage In 2025, people aren't just using Google anymore. They're asking ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity for business recommendations. Your website needs to be optimized for AI discovery, not just traditional search engines.The 90-Day AI Implementation Framework Month 1: Audit and Automate the Basics Start with what's currently breaking because it depends on you:Content Creation: What messaging do you personally write that could be templated? Decision Documentation: What choices do you make repeatedly that could be systematized? Client Communications: What conversations do you have that follow similar patterns? The CEO's realization: "Better demos, better storytelling, better targeting of accounts... all of these things are really low-hanging fruit."Month 2: Build Your AI Content System The Three-Pillar Approach:Content Multiplication: One piece of content becomes 5-10 across different formats Voice Consistency: AI maintains your tone while scaling your output Discovery Optimization: Content that works for both humans and AI search Month 3: Measure and Scale Set specific targets like the CEO did: "If we can get $500,000 of sales into our organization in the next nine months, then everything else becomes... we can make those investments."Q: How do I know if AI automation is actually working for my business? A: Set specific revenue targets tied to your AI implementations. If automated content leads to more qualified conversations, if systematized processes reduce your personal involvement, and if scaled messaging increases deal velocity, you're on the right track.Practical AI Tools for Startup CEOs Content and Communication Systems Based on the conversation, here are the AI implementations that work:Meeting Documentation: Record and automatically summarize key decisions Content Adaptation: Turn one presentation into multiple marketing assets Email Templates: AI-powered but personally approved response systems Process Documentation: Capture your decision-making patterns for others to follow The Agility Advantage One key benefit the CEO identified: "We can pivot really fast if something's not working. So we can start working on... we really need to beef up your website with more searchable content... if we're finding that it's not making improvement, we can drop that immediately."AI systems let you test and adjust quickly without the overhead of traditional hiring or lengthy implementations.Your AI Priority List:Automate repeated communications (highest impact, lowest risk) Systematize content creation (scales your voice without scaling your time) Document decision processes (reduces bottlenecks when you're unavailable) Optimize for AI discovery (positions you for how people search in 2025) Key Takeaways <ul><li>Start with execution, not strategy - AI tools work best when applied to real operational problems</li><li>Use AI as your multiplier - Scale your authentic voice and decisions rather than replacing them</li><li>Focus on content multiplication</li><li>One piece of approved content becomes 5-10 across different formats</li><li>Optimize for AI search - LLM SEO is as important as traditional SEO in 2025 • Set revenue-based targets</li><li>Measure AI success through business outcomes, not just efficiency metrics • Test quickly and pivot</li><li>AI implementations allow rapid iteration without traditional hiring overhead • Document everything</li><li>Your decision patterns are often more valuable than your individual decisions</li></ul>Your Next Step: The 30-Day AI Audit The CEO in this conversation is implementing a systematic approach to scale his personal involvement. You should do the same.Week 1: List everything that currently requires your personal involvement Week 2: Identify which of these follow repeatable patterns Week 3: Choose 2-3 highest-impact areas for AI automation Week 4: Implement one pilot system and measure resultsRemember: You're not trying to remove yourself from leadership decisions. You're building systems that handle routine execution so you can focus on the strategic work only you can do.The goal isn't to do less—it's to multiply your impact through systematic AI implementation that grows with your business.This analysis is based on real CEO conversations about AI implementation and operational scaling. For more insights on systematic business growth using AI tools, explore our resources on executive automation and leadership scaling strategies.

How to delegate as new CEO and use AI?

<figure id="figure-roqouuqa5mdswg4lm"><img id="roqouuqa5mdswg4lm" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/10NQN8XEh8uwrIeWpd8Jd4Jil2TIJBd8OucYoejKlRCQzxG9p2O1mpxNKyyUhJKS.jpg" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 1/1; object-position: 25% 25%;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="1:1" data-caption="" data-positionX="25%" data-positionY="25%" data-fullWidth="false"/></figure>The real challenge every founder faces: competing with bigger players while wearing every hat in your companyQuick Answers to What You're Actually Searching For How do I balance customer discovery with product development as a solo founder? Split your time strategically: 40% customer discovery, 30% product development, 30% marketing execution. Use LinkedIn, conferences, and direct outreach to understand your market while keeping product momentum.What's the biggest mistake founders make with go-to-market strategy? Trying to be everything to everyone. Focus on one specific use case that solves a real problem, then expand from there.How do I compete with bigger companies when I'm bootstrapped? Leverage your speed advantage. While big companies debate strategy, you can test, iterate, and deploy solutions in weeks, not months.Should I hire a go-to-market agency when I'm self-funded? Only if they understand your constraints and can work within your budget. Look for agencies that offer proof-of-concept work or success-based pricing.How do I know if my AI product actually solves a real problem? Your prospects will tell you specific dollar amounts they'd pay to solve the problem. If they can't put a number on it, keep digging.&nbsp; The Reality Check Every Technical Founder Needs You started building because you saw a problem that technology could solve. But now you're facing the hardest transition in entrepreneurship: shifting from engineer to business builder.This conversation with a technical founder captures exactly what most of you are experiencing right now. You've got a working product, early customers showing interest, but you're hitting the wall every founder hits—how do you scale go-to-market when you're doing everything yourself?The Context: A conversation between two founders at different stages. One building an AI document processing company, the other helping founders scale their go-to-market using AI-human frameworks. Both navigating the same fundamental challenge: how to punch above your weight when competing with bigger players.Transcript edited for clarity and readability&nbsp; The Conversation: Real Founder Challenges in Real Time The Product-Market Fit Discovery Phase Technical Founder: "I'm the founder of DocRouter AI. We do document processing for business documents. Unstructured documents, multilayered. It's human-in-the-loop for precision. So a typical application would be in regulated industries where you can't use pure AI agents because they're maybe 80%, 90% accurate. You need that evaluation step, and you bring the human in to do it accurately."This is exactly right. The founder immediately identifies the core value proposition: precision in regulated industries. No buzzwords, no "AI will change everything" nonsense. Just a clear problem and solution.Go-to-Market Expert: "Who do you find is your ideal buyer?"Technical Founder: "There are kind of two use cases showing up again and again. One is as an AI enabler for other startups or enterprises that don't have a big engineering department to implement in-house. DocRouter becomes the AI backbone, and they put the UI front end that's specific to their application. The ideal customer for that would be maybe a CTO type or a CEO who knows what they want to build, but they don't have the resources to do it.The second application is just a point solution where a company has a specific problem with documents, like ingesting insurance forms or certain types of transportation supply chain forms. These customers typically don't have any engineering in-house. They might even outsource IT, and they're not interested in the technology details. They just want the problem solved and look at the dollars and cents."The Go-to-Market Reality Check This founder discovered something crucial: he has two completely different buyers with different motivations, different languages, and different decision-making processes.Buyer #1: Technical leaders who understand what they want but lack resources Buyer #2: Operations leaders who just want problems solved Most founders try to serve both simultaneously and end up serving neither well.Go-to-Market Expert: "How are you finding connecting with clients right now?"Technical Founder: "I'm doing less engineering and more go-to-market. LinkedIn, cold outreach, going to conferences, poster sessions. I'm trying to figure out how to balance my time between customer discovery, feature roadmap, and marketing and outreach."This is the moment every technical founder hits. You realize that building the best product doesn't guarantee customers will find you. You have to go out and compete for their attention.The Resource Constraint Reality Technical Founder: "I'm also self-funded. I don't have seed funds, so I have to pay out of pocket for whatever engagement."Go-to-Market Expert: "I'm looking for some early adopters, so we can do it for maybe at cost or something that works for you."This exchange highlights something critical: both founders are trying to punch above their weight. The technical founder needs go-to-market help but has budget constraints. The go-to-market expert needs proof points but wants to help.This is exactly how early-stage partnerships should work—mutual value creation within real constraints.&nbsp; What This Conversation Reveals About Modern Go-to-Market 1. The Technical Founder's Dilemma Every technical founder faces the same transition:Phase 1: Build the product (comfortable zone) Phase 2: Find customers who will pay for it (uncomfortable zone) Phase 3: Scale customer acquisition (completely new skillset) The founder in this conversation is squarely in Phase 2, which is actually where most technical founders get stuck.2. The Two-Customer Problem Having two distinct customer types isn't necessarily bad, but it requires different strategies:For Technical Buyers (CTOs/CEOs):Lead with technical capabilities and integration possibilities Speak their language about APIs, scalability, and technical debt Show them how you solve problems they understand but can't resource For Operations Buyers (Non-technical):Lead with business outcomes and ROI Speak their language about cost savings and process improvements Show them dollars and cents, not features and functions 3. The Bootstrap Advantage (That Most Founders Don't Use) Being self-funded forces you to:Focus ruthlessly on customers who will actually pay Move faster than funded competitors who can afford to debate strategy Validate real demand instead of assumption-based product development Build sustainable unit economics from day one The competitive advantage: While bigger companies are having committee meetings about AI strategy, you can ship solutions and iterate based on real customer feedback.&nbsp; The Go-to-Market Framework That Actually Works for Technical Founders Step 1: Choose Your Primary Customer (For Now) Pick one of your customer types and go deep. The founder in this conversation should choose based on:Which customers pay faster? Which customers have simpler buying processes? Which customers can become references for others? Recommendation: Start with the operations buyers. They have clearer pain points, simpler decision processes, and measure success in dollars saved, not technical elegance.Step 2: The 40-30-30 Time Split 40% Customer Discovery:LinkedIn outreach to specific decision-makers Industry conferences and networking events Direct conversations with prospects about their real problems 30% Product Development:Build features that directly address discovered customer needs Create proof-of-concept demonstrations for prospects Develop case studies from early customers 30% Marketing Execution:Content that speaks to your chosen customer's language Building your reputation in their specific industry Creating systems for consistent outreach and follow-up Step 3: The Competitive Positioning Strategy Don't compete on features. Compete on outcomes.Instead of: "We use advanced AI with human-in-the-loop validation" Say: "We help insurance companies process 10x more claims without hiring more staff"Instead of: "Our API integrates with existing systems" Say: "Start processing documents tomorrow without changing your current workflow"&nbsp; How to Use AI to Compete Above Your Weight Class The Strategic Approach The go-to-market expert in this conversation uses what he calls an "AI-human framework." Here's how it works:For Content Creation:AI handles the first draft and research Human adds industry expertise and authentic voice Result: Content that sounds human but scales like technology For LinkedIn Strategy:AI analyzes successful content in your industry Human adds personal insights and competitive intelligence Result: Consistent presence without consuming all your time For Customer Research:AI helps analyze customer feedback patterns Human conducts the actual discovery conversations Result: Faster insight gathering and pattern recognition The Implementation Reality What the go-to-market expert actually does: "We did a brand analysis, helping understand his voice and tone, then incorporating that into a content strategy. We're using him as the centerpiece rather than posting on the company LinkedIn page. He's building awareness and engagement through that. We're not using AI to replace him because his voice matters, but we're expediting the process so he doesn't have to spend the time writing each unique post."This is the competitive advantage smaller companies have: Your founder's authentic voice and industry expertise, amplified by AI efficiency.&nbsp; The Practical Implementation Guide Week 1-2: Customer Definition Interview 10 potential customers from each customer type Document their specific language about the problem Identify which type has more urgent, expensive problems Week 3-4: Message Testing Create specific value propositions for your chosen customer type Test these messages in LinkedIn outreach Track response rates and conversation quality Week 5-8: Content System Develop a content calendar addressing your customers' real questions Use AI to help with research and first drafts Add your technical expertise and industry insights Post consistently and engage with responses Week 9-12: Sales Process Document your successful customer conversations Create templates for common objections and questions Build a simple CRM system to track prospects Develop case studies from early wins &nbsp; The Budget Reality for Self-Funded Founders What Actually Works When Money Is Tight High-Impact, Low-Cost Activities:LinkedIn content strategy (time investment, not money) Industry conference networking (registration fees only) Direct email outreach to specific prospects (free) Customer interview programs (builds relationships while researching) Medium-Cost, High-ROI Investments:Professional headshots and brand photography Basic website optimization for your specific customers Industry publication advertising in targeted newsletters Speaking opportunities at industry events What to Avoid Until You Have Revenue:Broad advertising campaigns Expensive marketing automation tools Generic content marketing agencies Trade show booths (attend and network instead) &nbsp; Key Takeaways for Technical Founders 1. Your Technical Background Is an Asset, Not a Liability You understand the problem better than most consultants. Use that knowledge to speak credibly about solutions, but translate it into business language.2. Bootstrap Constraints Force Better Decisions Having limited resources means you can't afford to chase bad prospects or build features nobody wants. This constraint actually helps you focus on what matters.3. Two Customer Types Require Two Different Approaches Don't try to speak to both simultaneously. Pick one, dominate that conversation, then expand to the second.4. AI Should Amplify Your Expertise, Not Replace It Use AI to handle research, first drafts, and data analysis. Keep the strategic thinking, customer relationships, and industry insights in your hands.5. Speed Is Your Competitive Advantage While bigger companies debate AI strategy, you can implement, test, and iterate. Use this advantage to build market position before they catch up.&nbsp; The Partnership Model That Actually Works The conversation between these two founders shows how early-stage partnerships should work:Mutual Value Creation:The technical founder gets go-to-market expertise within budget constraints The go-to-market expert gets proof points and case studies Both win when the customer succeeds Realistic Expectations:Work within actual budget constraints Focus on proof-of-concept before large commitments Structure agreements around mutual success Strategic Alignment:Both founders understand competitive realities Both focus on punching above their weight class Both use AI to amplify human expertise, not replace it &nbsp; Next Steps: Choose Your Path If You're the Technical Founder: This week: Choose your primary customer type based on urgency and simplicity Next month: Implement the 40-30-30 time split and track how it affects your pipeline Next quarter: Build case studies from early wins and expand to your second customer type If You're Looking for Go-to-Market Help: Find partners who understand bootstrap constraints and can work within your reality Look for proof-of-concept approaches rather than large upfront commitments Focus on partners who amplify your expertise rather than replace your voice If You're Competing with Bigger Players: Use speed as your advantage while they debate committee decisions Focus on specific customer problems they're too broad to address Build authentic relationships they can't match with process and scale &nbsp; The Bottom Line Every technical founder faces the same transition: from building products to building businesses. The founders in this conversation are navigating it in real time, with real constraints, making real decisions.Your technical expertise is your competitive advantage. Your bootstrap constraints force better decisions. Your ability to move fast while bigger companies debate strategy is your window of opportunity.The question isn't whether you can compete with bigger players. The question is whether you'll use your advantages to do it.What's your next move?

How to Balance Go-to-Market and Product Development When You're Doing Everything Yourself

MomentumEngine

’m building a modern, media-powered strategy platform called Momentum Engine.  It’s designed to help founders, GTM leaders, and small teams compete with larger companies using AI. We do this through:

MomentumEngine

Blog

New PostHow Do Leaders Use AI When Their Job Isn't Conten...

Why Your AI Marketing Isn't Working (And Your Competitors...

Overcoming Challenges with AI-Powered Strategy Platforms

How to delegate as new CEO and use AI?

How to Balance Go-to-Market and Product Development When ...